Housekeeping Systems,
Inc. |
||
Articles & Reports |
How you gather,
manage and use information ----- Bill Gates, 1993 |
Design Components for a Successful Environmental Services
Operation
If you design a product like an automobile engine, you will spend a great deal
of time designing the most
efficient components to use when building it. An engine designed from the ground
up to be more efficient
than an engine built from spare parts.
Operational Design
It is important, when designing a housekeeping operation, to
design each component to be consistent with
all other components so that the housekeeping operation can achieve its potential
by maximizing its productivity.
The following steps are necessary when designing a flexible and highly productive
housekeeping operation:
Define area types and measure what needs to be cleaned.
The square footage of each area to be cleaned must be measured
and recorded. Each area should be identified
as to its specific use (office, corridor, rest room, etc.) and floor surface
type (buffable, non-buffable or carpet).
Define tasks, performance criteria and accompanying
production rates in relation to each identified area type.
A set of tasks, common to all area types, should be defined.
Production rates should be developed, using a common
measurable unit, for each task and area type combination.
Performance criteria should be developed for each task that
defines the result of performing the task correctly.
These performance criteria should be used to establish the inspection program
of a quality assurance program.
Establish the service level and communicate it to
all occupants.
Establish a performance frequency for each task in each area
type. Don’t assume that every task must be performed
on a daily basis. Test task frequencies by performing the task in specific areas
and observing how long it takes until
the task actually needs performing again. Negotiate the service level with the
institution’s executive level management
and when they approve the service level, communicate it to all occupants.
Apply the service level (tasks, production rates
and frequencies) to the measured areas.
Applying the agreed upon service level to the measured areas
will calculate the performance time for each task in
each area enabling tasks in specific areas to be assigned to individual employees.
Account for areas that need to be cleaned multiple
times per day as well as variable work loads.
Some areas must be cleaned multiple times per day. For example;
Emergency Rooms are typically fully cleaned
two or sometimes three times per day because of the intensity of foot traffic.
Often it may only be a single task
that must be performed multiple times per day. For example; school custodians
who empty trash in the cafeteria
in-between multiple lunch periods. Areas that must be multiple-cleaned should
be recorded as separate square
footage entries. To do otherwise will understate staffing needs in these areas.
A variable work load is a task regularly performed by the housekeeping
department that varies in its frequency
and intensity of performance.
For example; hospital custodians must clean patient room after
the patient is dismissed. Cleaning a dismissal room
involves cleaning the furniture and room where a patient was dismissed from
the hospital in preparation for admitting
a new patient into the same room. The volume of dismissals varies with the day
of the week and the time of day.
School custodians clean up at the end of after-school functions.
PTA meetings, athletic banquets, dress rehearsals
for the band and choir all generate work for the custodian that vary in intensity
and frequency.
Variable work loads must be studied for a period of time and
an average daily amount should be predicted based on
actual historic need. Once an average daily amount is determined, it should
be entered and assigned to the appropriate
employee or employees.
Account for non-cleaning and cleaning-related tasks.
Non-cleaning and cleaning-related tasks are those that cannot
be directly applied to square footage. Tasks such as supply
distribution, trash removal, from the facility, secretarial support, supervision,
group leader time, opening and securing the
building, power plant duties, etc. are examples of such tasks.
These tasks should be studied for a period of time and an average
daily amount should be predicted based on historic need.
Once an average daily amount is determined, it should be entered and assigned
to the appropriate employee or employees.
Design an audio-visual training program that teaches
employees to achieve the results stated in the task performance criteria.
Constant, intensive and consistent training is one of the keys
to building a highly productive housekeeping operation.
Unfortunately it is one of the most short-changed components of a successful
housekeeping operation.
Departmental mangers frequently shorten a new employee’s
initial training and fail to provide regular in-service training for
existing employees in order to put those employees into immediate production.
This short sighted behavior fails to provide
an environment where employees can refine cleaning technique in a group setting
and develop a consistent process that is
motion efficient. When employees are put into immediate production without adequate
initial and recurring training they
will refine and perfect incorrect and unproductive processes.
An audio-visual training program must be developed that will
train employees to efficiently perform the tasks that were
developed earlier. The audio-visual training program should describe each task
well enough so that the employee understands
how to perform the task so that they can achieve the performance criteria for
each task.
Training program modules should be developed that teach the
cleaning task sequences for the institution’s critical area types
(rest room cleaning, public area cleaning, patient room cleaning, classroom
cleaning, etc.). Written testing materials should be
developed for each module that can be used to document training results.
The training modules should be developed in a format that requires
a live presentation of the materials. Live presentation
by the employee’s immediate supervisor will strengthen the relationship
between the employee and supervisor. When
the supervisor becomes the employee’s active trainer, they become more
of a leader than a boss. The act of making live
presentations of training materials will strengthen and develop the technical
and communication skills of the supervisor.
New employees should review each module that applies directly
to their responsibilities prior to being allowed to
perform alone or in tandem with another employee. This may mean that a new employee
spends a large part of their
first day on the job in a classroom setting reviewing training modules with
their immediate supervisor. This initial
bonding between the supervisor and new employee will pay dividend later in increased
employee cooperation and production.
Existing employees should review one or two modules that apply
directly to their assigned duties at least monthly in a
classroom setting with other employees. This setting can provide the team-like
feedback necessary to build consistent
performance technique.
Emphasis should be placed on the employee developing motion
efficiency. This is done through consistent emphasis
on the details of task performance. Discussing how to move from one step to
another, how to move through a room
while performing tasks, how to keep supplies close at hand, how to adjust a
trigger sprayer and how much to wring
out a damp mop are examples of the details that help develop motion efficiency.
Design a quality assurance program that confirms
the correct performance of the previously developed tasks.
A quality assurance program should be developed that uses the
performance criteria developed earlier to verify
correct task performance.
Inspections should be performed by the employee’s
immediate supervisor and should be scheduled frequently
enough to provide regular feedback concerning performance to each employee.
An inspection should be unannounced and should take place shortly
after the area to be inspected has been cleaned.
The supervisor should ask the employee to accompany them during the inspection.
This will serve as an additional
opportunity for the supervisor to
train the employee.
The inspection should take place in a small representative sample
of the employees assigned areas. For example; one
patient room and patient rest room in a hospital or one large classroom in a
school or two or three private office
spaces in an office building will provide enough area for a meaningful inspection.
The inspection should be scored and a minimum passing score
established. Scores should be tracked for each employee
and used to identify individual training needs.
Conclusion
A well designed and implemented housekeeping operation will
pay dividends far in excess of its initial implementation
costs. Once an organized plan has been implemented, it provides the foundation
for creating a successful and responsive
housekeeping operation.
Departmental management can use the momentum from a highly productive
housekeeping operation to
further enhance the department’s productivity once the concepts of continuous
improvement are understood.
Return to Top of Page
Why Not Use Free Housekeeping Software From a Supply Vendor?
Free (or nearly free) software sounds almost too good to be
true doesn't it? If you've been around the
housekeeping industry for any time at all, you've probably heard that some chemical
and supply vendors
will give you housekeepng software, and in some cases actually load the software
with your information,
in exchange for your supply business. In other words, you get free software
if you agree to purchase
supplies from these vendors.
Free software is out there if you want it, but be aware that
there is a cost associated with everything.
You've probably also heard the saying "If it sounds too good to be true,
then it probably is". At the very
least, you should expect to pay more for those supplies than you would normally
when "free" products or
services are involved. Vendors are business people who must make a profit. In
other words, they must
profit from providing you a "free" product or service.
But those are the obvious arguments against using "free"
software. Look a little deeper and you will see
other issues. Look at another industry (Finance) and draw a comparison there.
Finance departments in
institutions and businesses use financial software to manage the entire financial
operations of their
business. Go ask your Chief Financial Officer it he or she would agree to use
"free" financial
management software in exchange for purchasing copy paper from a vendor. After
they stopped
laughing, they would likely ask you to leave because they don't have time to
waste. Does this
person know something you don't? Yes - They understand that nothing in life
is free and when it
comes to a critical component of your business, another phrase accurately describes
the situation -
"You get what you pay for".
Look for a moment at the supply vendor's motivations for offering
"free" software in the first place.
They think that they can make a profit from offering "free" software.
Any good vendor (let's say a
chemical vendor for example), knows chemicals. They know how to make, transport,
warehouse, and
sell chemicals. They understand chemicals inside and out. That's their job.
They're in the chemical
business. They are not in the housekeeping business. That's your job. You should
know housekeeping
forwards and backwards; inside and out. Go back to your Chief Fanancial Officer
and ask them if
they would take financial advice from a copy paper salesperson?
Now go back to thinking about the vendor who is offering you
"free" software. How much time and
money do you think they are really going to spend on developing quality software?
That's the first
time the word "quality" has come up. After all, you only said you
wanted software. Remember, that
chemical vendor, in our example, understands chemicals and not software. They
have some software,
but they don't understand housekeeping like you do.
Don't expect a supply vendor to help you learn how to make effective
use of your software.
You're on your own. Are you going to have confidence that they can provide you
with a tool to
help manage your department? Is your operation important enough to your organization
that it
is worth spending enough money to get the right software, or will any software
do?
Why Database Development is So Important
The database that must be developed for any housekeeping software
to function, is like the engine in an
automobile. Its what makes a car go. It determines how fast the car can go as
well as how much you
can load into the car and how much the car will tow. At
least when you're shopping for a car, you can
open the hood and look at the engine. Even if you don't know a lot about engines,
you can tell something
about the power of the engine. Most people understand that an 8 cylinder engine
is generally more
powerful than a 4 cylinder engine.
Unfortunately you don't get to see the database in your housekeeping
software until its been completed.
Imagine that you are shopping for a new car. You've decided on the make, model,
color and the interior
styling, but you're not allowed to see or know anything about the engine until
after you purchase the car.
The dealer has two cars on the lot that match your selections. Oh, by the way,
you're not allowed to
drive either of the two until you've purchased. You can drive the demonstrator
models they have on the
lot, but not the one you're going to purchase.
You travel a lot on interstate highways, so its important to
you to have a car that can get to your
destination quickly, and you tow a large boat to a lake deep in the mountains
where your vacation house
is located. How do you choose between the two identical cars? On price? If you
pick wrong, you'll end
up with a car that isn't fast or powerful enough to do what you need to do.
Enough about the automobile example. From more than 30 years
experience in housekeeping
management, and the last 20 of that working with housekeeping software and databases,
we believe that by far, the most important concern for anyone considering the
purchase of
housekeeping software is how the database will be developed. If your database
is not developed
properly, you will not be able to use your housekeeping software for much of
anything.
Database development can be a daunting task. Making certain that all the bits
of information are
in the right place and in the right format for everything to work out correctly
can be time consuming
and frustrating. Every piece of data that goes into a database affects how the
completed database
will function. Well thought out and carefully executed data development will
make the critical
difference in whether your workloading software will function the way you want
it to or not. HSI
has spent literally decades perfecting its data development techniques. HSI
understands how the
modern housekeeping or environmental services manager wants to use their environmental
services
software once the database has been developed.
Each HSI project leader has had several years of experience actually managing
housekeeping and
environmental services departments in a variety of facilities. They know the
challenges facing
managers in today's fast-paced and stressful environment.
Want more information on data development? Read about HSI's Software Implementation
Options
on the Software Page under Implementation
Options.
How should your database be developed and what should it contain
in order to have housekeeping
software that is really useful? Read - Understanding
Workloading found elsewhere on this page.
Workloading is the process whereby the appropriate amount of
time is calculated for performing one or
more tasks is a specific space at a facility. Just because someone offers you
"housekeeping software",
doesn't mean that the software can perform workloading. Some software offered
as "housekeeping
software" provides only employee training materials or performs inspections
or calculates supply
usage, but has no workloading capability. If you are shopping for housekeeping
workloading software,
be aware of this and know what kind of software is being offered.
Even if you are being offered workloading software, be aware
that unless the database is developed
correctly, you may not be able to make full use of your workloading software
after the database has been
completed. See - Why Database Development is So Important,
found elsewhere on this page.
How useful any housekeepng workloading software is when the
database is complete, is in direct relation
to the level of detail to which the database was developed. The database contained
within a fully
functioning housekeeping software package contains a number of different tables.
A table is much like
one folder in a large file cabinet where the entire file cabinet is the database.
There are two tables in your
database that will determine how useful your software will be once the database
is complete -
the Task Table and the Space Inventory Table.
Every vendor's workloading software has its equivilent
of these two tables.
Understanding Workloading - The Task Table
The task table contains information about what employees do
- they clean. How you define what it is that
your employees do is one of the critical factors in how useful and easy to maintain
your software will be
once the database has been completed. The task table will also contain the production
rate for each task
described. you should have a way to adjust the production rate so that you can
tune it to your specific
situation. Tasks and production rates can be created in differeing amounts of
detail. Following are some
examples of task definitions and how detailed they are.
Task Examples-High
Detail |
Task Examples-Medium
Detail |
Task Examples-Low
Detail |
Dust Table | Empty Trash Cans | Clean Office |
Dust Chair | Spot Clean Furniture & Building Surfaces | Clean Corridor |
Dust TV | High Dust Furniture & Building Surfaces | Clean Classroom |
Spot Clean Pictures | Dust Mop - 36" Tool | Clean Laboratory |
Spot Clean Door Handle | Damp Mop | Clean Lobby |
Spot Clean Table | Disinfect Restroom Fixtures | Clean Library |
Empty Trash - Large Can | Police Elevator | Clean Patient Room |
As a general rule, the more detailed you tasks are, the more
more flexibility you have in your database
and the less detail you have in your tasks, the less flexibility - However,
too much detail can lead to
a situation where you have to spend too much time updating your database.
Understanding Workloading - The Space Inventory Table
The space inventory table contains information about where your
employees do the cleaning. How you
define your space is the second critical factor in how useful and easy to maintain
your software will be once
the database has been completed. Level of detail is important in the space inventory
table also. Following
are examples of differing detail levels in the development of the space inventory
table.
Space Examples-High
Detail |
Space Examples-Medium
Detail |
Space Examples-Low
Detail |
Room 305-Waiting Room | Suite 305-Prof. Jones Lab Complex | Third Floor |
Room 305a-Interior Corridor | Suite 306-Dr. Halls Office Complex | First Floor Public Areas |
Room 305b-Reception | Room 542-Patient Room & Restroom | Russell Building Offices |
Room 305c-Exam Room 1 | Room 573-Nurses Station Complex | Russell Building Classrooms |
Room 305d-Exam Room 2 | Room 104-Chemistry Lab & Storage | Science Dept. Classrooms |
Room 305e-Doctors Office | Suite 101-School Admin. Complex | Security Building |
Room 305f-Break Room | Room 286-Men's Shower & Lockers | Student Center |
Again, the general rule with the space inventory table is "The
more detail - the more flexibility and the
less detail - the less flexibility". You could also state that general
rule another way: "The more detail -
the more database maintenance time required".
Understanding Workloading - High Detail vs. Low Detail - Advantages & Disadvantages
At first, some people assume that the highest level of detail
is best because it offers the most flexability in
workloading. They're right, however, the highest level of detail also can create
a data maintenance nightmare.
Imagine a situation where you have high detail tasks like "Spot Clean Pictures"
in high detail space like
"Bill Preston's Office", and you have hundreds, if not thousands,
of offices in your facility. You would have
to maintain an accurate inventory of pictures for each space. Do you want to
count the pictures in every
space and then monitor them to make sure you always have the correct number
workloaded in each space?
Likewise, some people assume that the low detail route is the way to go. It
is the fastest way to develop
your database. It can also leave you with no flexibility in workloading. Imagine
as an example that you
have a low detail database where you have a task like "Clean Office"
in a space called "Russell Building
Offices". Administration decides, that to save money, it wants the Housekeeping
Department to continue
to empty the trash every day in the Russell Building offices but only clean
each office once each week,
except for Professor Russell's offices. They want to continue full daily services
to his offices (after all
the building is named after him and all). You will end up having to delete the
Russell Building and
re-engineer a higher detail database in order to accommodate two different service
levels in the same
building.
We have found that the medium detail database works best for
our clients. It gives them the best
balance between flexability and power and doesn't require too much time for
data maintenance. Our
project managers, who supervise the development of client databases, will develop
parts of a client
database in either high-detail or low-detail depending on how the client will
end up using the database
after it has been developed. Database development is the key to a successful
housekeeping software
installation.
Understanding Workloading - How the Two Tables Interact - Coming Soon
Understanding and Developing Production Rates
A production rate is a statement of the time necessary to perform
a specific task in a standardized
amount of space. A production rate statement always has three parts - Task,
Time and Space/Unit.
Below are some examples of production rate statements in a system that uses
1000 square feet (the
Space/Unit component of the statement) as as standardized space:
Task |
Time |
Space/Unit |
Remove Trash | 6 Minutes | per 1000 Square Feet |
Spot Clean | 3.5 Minutes | per 1000 Square Feet |
Dust Mop - 24-Inch Tool | 7.25 Minutes | per 1000 Square Feet |
Damp Mop | 12 Minutes | per 1000 Square Feet |
Police Elevator | 2 Minutes | per Cab |
Disinfect Restroom Fixture | 1 Minute | per Fixture |
There is more than one production rate system. They differ,
primarily, in the part of the statement that is
standardized. Below are some examples of production rates that use Time as the
standardized component:
Task |
Space/Unit |
Time |
Remove Trash | 10,000 Square Feet | per Hour |
Spot Clean | 17,000 Square Feet | per Hour |
Dust Mop - 24-Inch Tool | 8,000 Square Feet | per Hour |
Damp Mop | 5,000 Square Feet | per Hour |
Police Elevator | 30,000 Square Feet | per Hour |
Disinfect Restroom Fixture | 60,000 Square Feet | per Hour |
A production rate is not a statement of how long it takes to
perform a specific task in a specific space.
That would be considered workloading. That may seem to be an unimportant distinction,
but it is what
makes housekeeping workloading software work.
The different systems of production rates are somewhat incompatible. Both of
the above examples of
production rate systems work just fine, but if you use some production rates
from one system and some
production rates from the other system, you will end up confusing yourself.
It's sort of like speaking or
listening to a mixture of equal parts english and french. You may understand
both languages, but you're
going to have to think about it harder than you would if you were speaking,
or listening to just english.
Understanding & Developing Production Rates - Developing
Your Own Production Rates
Developing your own production rates is tedious but rewarding. It's not hard,
but it will take some time.
You will also gain a much better understanding of the work you are developing
production rates for.
The first step is to determine the tasks that you will be developing production
rates for. It is important
to not mix systems in your task set either. Review the article Understanding
Workloading - Task Table.
Develop production rates for either low-detail, medium-detail or high-detail
tasks, but don't mix then up.
We recommend that you use the medium-detail task examples, because we know that
they work the
best, but develop production rates for any task list you desire.
Let's say that one of the tasks you will be developing a production rate for
is "Remove Trash". Go out
into your facility and measure off 1000 square feet of several different area
types where you perform
the task. You should select the area types that represent the majority of your
total square footage. Area
Types such as Office, Corridor, Rest Room and Dining Room will probably be on
your list. If your
facility is a school or university, you probably want to have Classroom and
Laboratory on your list.
If your facility is a hospital or nursing home, you probably want to have Patient/Resident
Room and
Treatment/Exam Room on your list. Add to your list any area type that is important
to you or that
gives you concern. Avoid area types that don't represent a significant amount
of square footage.
Perform the task in one of the area types where you have measured off 1000 square
feet of space.
Record the number of minutes it took. Have someone else perform the task and
record the results.
Have different people perform the task and record the results each time. Average
the times to come
to an approximation of the production rate. People performing the task should
not try to speed through
it or slow down the performance in an attempt to skew the results. You want
an honest and real result.
Move on to the next area type and repeat the process. In the end, you should
have a pretty fair set of
production rates.
Understanding & Developing Production Rates - Task - Remove
Trash
Area Type |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 3 |
Test 4 |
Test 5 |
Average |
Office | 6.2 |
6.9 |
7.2 |
5.8 |
6.5 |
6.52 min. |
Classroom | 3.2 |
3.5 |
4.5 |
3.1 |
3.6 |
3.58 min. |
Laboratory | 4.5 |
4.8 |
3.8 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.42 min. |
Patient Room | 4.8 |
4.6 |
4.4 |
5.1 |
4.7 |
4.72 min. |
Restroom | 8.6 |
7.5 |
7.6 |
8.1 |
7.9 |
7.94 min. |
Corridor | 1.0 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
1.7 |
1.5 |
1.40 min. |
After you have your raw production rate times for the task,
you should ask yourself if the average times
generated actually reflect the time necessary to perform the task in all examples
of the area type under
study at your facility? Take the area type "Office" for example. Does
your facility have different types of
offices like Executive Offices, Private Offices, Modular Offices, Open Offices
and office spaces that are
so packed together that you have to turn sideways to maneuver between the isles?
We call those Dense
Offices. If so, you may have to engineer seperate production rates for each
distinctly different office spaces.
Using Production Rates to Calculate Cleaning Times - Coming Soon
Benchmarking has been used for years to help improve productivity
in large manufacturing companies.
More recently benchmarking techniques have been used in service orientated companies
to the same end.
The financial executives in your facility probably study the benchmarks for
all departments, including
housekeeping. Knowing how benchmarks are developed and what you can do to make
them appear
better can influence how your department is perceived by your facility’s
executives.
A benchmark is a snapshot in time that defines the current situation
in financial terms. For example,
a company might spend $23,000 to produce 1000 widgets. At a very basic level,
that company’s benchmark
for producing widgets is $23.00 per widget. If a company across town can product
the same widget for
$21.00 per widget, the second company is more productive and has an advantage
in the marketplace.
A housekeeping department provides a service (cleaning) to the
facility (which can be defined by its square
footage). The most basic of all benchmarks for the housekeeping department is
“Cost per Square Foot”.
For example, if your budget is $3,000,000 per year and your department services
1,250,000 square feet of
space, the cost for cleaning at your facility is $2.40 per square foot ($3,000,000
÷ 1,250,000 square feet).
The are only two ways to make this benchmark better:
• Decrease the dollars spent cleaning the same square
footage
• Increase the square footage cleaned without increasing the cost.
Benchmarking - Service Level is the Key
Going back to our widget example for a moment – The manufacturer
of widgets at $23.00 per widget can
only make their benchmark better by either lowering their cost to produce widgets
or producing more widgets
for the same amount of money. Lowering the salaries of the employees would lower
the cost of producing
widgets but that’s a rather impractical solution. Using less raw materials
and making each widget smaller
would lower the cost too, but the designers of the widget created design specifications
and tolerances so
that each widget produced would perform a particular job. A smaller widget,
using fewer raw materials,
just wouldn’t work.
The primary difference between benchmarking in a manufacturing
industry and in a service industry is the
concept of design specifications. If you change the design specifications the
product will not work! In the
housekeeping industry, the counterpart to design specifications is Service Level.
Service Level is the
combination of tasks and their performance frequencies.
Contracted housekeeping operations are frequently bound by contract
to perform at a designated service level.
Changes to the service level have to be negotiated and the contract price (a
benchmark in itself) can go up or
down. Many in-house housekeeping operations are mandated, by their Chief Executive
Officer, to provide a
dictated service level. The key point here is that the housekeeping manager
seldom, in ever, has the authority
to significantly change the service level, along with the corresponding budget
and resulting benchmarks,
without prior approval from somewhere up the chain of command.
When you adjust the service level, you are adjusting labor.
The higher the service level the higher the labor
used. Labor represents roughly 90% of you entire budget. If you cannot adjust
labor on your own the only
way to change the benchmark is to adjust the amount of money you spend on materials.
If your materials
cost represents roughly 10% of your budget, it will be difficult to impact the
benchmark by purchasing cheaper
chemicals and equipment. In fact, cheaper materials may well increase the need
for labor. A cheaper floor
finish may need to be burnished more frequently and cheaper vacuum cleaners
may mean that employees
must spend more time vacuuming.
Benchmarking - Modifying Service Level
If you’re trying to make your benchmarks look better,
there are a couple of rules of thumb for modifying the
service level without impacting appearance level too much.
• Adjust service level in areas out of the public eye
• Adjust service level in area types representing a large percentage of
your total square feet
A hospital should avoid adjusting service level in patient rooms,
public corridors and restrooms. A college
should avoid adjusting service level in classrooms, corridors and restrooms.
It’s doubtful that you can have
a significant impact on your benchmarks by adjusting the service level in area
types such as storage rooms
and file rooms. The area type that is out of the public eye and also representing
a large percentage of the
total square feet of many facilities is office space.
Lowering the service level in an area type like offices should
not be done without the input and the approval of
key office workers as well as someone at the executive level. Office workers
consider their offices to be their
personal territory and don’t like to see changes made without their input.
Before approaching your boss about lowering a service level,
you should explore the possibilities and
estimate the potential savings. Fully define your current service level for
offices. You probably don’t
clean every surface in every office every day. Make a chart similar to the one
below:
Task |
Frequency |
Min/1000 SqFt |
Converted to Daily
Number |
Remove Trash |
5 x Week |
6.0 |
6.0 |
High Dust |
1 x Week |
3.5 |
0.7 |
Spot Clean |
2 x Week |
4.5 |
1.8 |
Vacuum |
5 x Week |
9.0 |
9.0 |
Total |
17.5 |
Calculate how long it takes your employees, on average, to perform
each task in 1000 square feet of typical
office space at your facility. Measure off the space and note the time it takes
for your employees cleaning
it on several different occasions. Clean the area yourself to verify the average
time. For any task that has a
frequency of less than 5 times per week you must convert the performance time
into a daily number. For
example, if spot cleaning takes 4.5 minutes to perform in the measured area
and you perform spot cleaning
only twice per week, perform the following calculation:
Spot Clean 4.5 min. x 2 times per week ÷ 5 days in a week = 1.8 minutes per day
After you’ve calculated each task time, fill in your chart.
In the example above, you've calculated that it
should take, on average, 17.5 minutes per 1000 square feet to clean in that
specific area type. The numbers
in this example chart will not accurately reflect how long it takes to perform
each task in offices at your
specific facility.
You will want to perform this calculation in several different
office spaces of 1000 square feet in order
to come up with a good average for your facility. Assuming your employees are
working with good
equipment and using correct techniques, you can fairly certain that it takes,
on average, 17.5 minutes
per 1000 square feet to clean offices in our example facility. All you need
to know now is how many
thousand square feet of office space you have in your facility and you will
know, with a short calculation,
how long, on average, it takes you to clean all offices in your facility.
You’re now in a position to estimate the potential savings
of a change in your service level to offices.
Think of what task you can eliminate or do less frequently in offices. Ask your
counterparts in other
facilities what their service level in offices is. Observe the office space
at the end of the office work day.
Does every trash can need emptying every day? How long does it take to really
notice dust accumulating
on ledges? If vacuuming is skipped on one day, is it really noticeable? Design
a new lower service level
and calculate the estimated cleaning times based on your observations. It will
look something like this:
Task |
Frequency |
Min/1000 SqFt |
Converted to Daily
Number |
Remove Trash |
5 x Week |
6.0 |
6.0 |
High Dust |
1 x Week |
3.5 |
0.7 |
Spot Clean |
1 x Week |
4.5 |
0.9 |
Vacuum |
1 x Week |
9.0 |
1.8 |
Total |
9.4 |
This new (lower) service level takes half as much time as the
original service level. Depending on how many
thousand square feet of offices you have in your facility, changing the service
level in offices could have a
major impact on your costs and resulting benchmarks.
Benchmarking - Define Your Way to Better Benchmarks
When you start comparing your benchmarks with benchmarks from
other facilities, you have to look beyond
the bottom line benchmark numbers to understand the true cost of service at
each facility. We've already talked
about service level. You cannot accurately compare yourself with another facility
unless you can normalize the
service level between the two. Although you can't account for every difference
between the two different service
levels, you should be able to account for variables responsible for major differences.
Another way to make your benchmarks look better is to understand
how your facility reports its own information,
which eventually results in your facility’s benchmark. In the case of
“Cost per Square Foot”, understanding the
definition of both “Cost” and of “Square Feet” can help
immeasurably in making your benchmarks look better
before you even address service level.
How does your facility define and report its cost? Given the
same square footage, a lower cost will create a
better benchmark. Does cost mean the total bottom line figure for everything
in the housekeeping department
or does it mean just labor costs? If the figure includes labor, does that also
mean the labor for departmental
management and clerical support? Some facilities don’t include that in
their reporting. Does cost include waste
removal tipping fees and other contracted services? Many times, that figure
is maintained outside the housekeeping
department’s budget. Understand exactly what cost means and you’ll
be in a better position to face challenges like
“Why are our benchmarks always higher than XYZ Facility?”
How does your facility define and report its square footage?
Given the same Cost figure, a higher square footage
number will create a better benchmark. Do you report your gross square footage
or net cleanable square footage?
Gross square footage, being a higher number, will create a better benchmark.
Do you clean anything outside the
facility like sidewalks or parking decks? If so, it’s a safe bet that
square footage is not included in the reporting
numbers.
Benchmarking - Summary
You have some control over what your benchmarks are. Knowing
and understanding how they are calculated
will give you the power you need to change them or explain why you cannot change
them.
Home | Software
| Training Programs | Staffing
Analysis | Inspection Services
| Conversion to In-House
| Support Programs
Cleaning Time Calculator | Housekeeping
News & History | Articles & Reports
| Fees | Contact
Us | Links
Copyright 2001~2011 Housekeeping Systems, Inc.
Privacy Policy